data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf42c/cf42c76d88de2b1648646e7466277e161749b3af" alt=""
Some consider this new love for kitsch as just a current trend, others consider it an 'aesthetic style', (much like steampunk or noir).
So, whether it's a trend or a lasting subculture, it's beginning to appear in art.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfb37/cfb37003ba07533779edad01ed2ed64f2f56a626" alt=""
The first time I noticed this was a few years ago.
You've got your doe-eyed girls, like Audrey Kawasaki, whose influence may be more from Japanese art and manga.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dabc7/dabc7634886ad8ee0c97af79f6a5d62f839cb5f1" alt=""
You've also got
your Western
versions,
with a more realistic approach, like
Bec Winnel.
(Pictured left is
her painting
"Niaidia".)
And, for anyone who's ever eaten at a disturbingly tacky Mexican restaurant,no doubt you have seen those old Mexican senorita pin-ups and bullfighter posters. There's
even an artist for that... (see Brian Viveros.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dbdf/1dbdf28ca3a5644f5eefd8b9d5461b8ab843b9ff" alt=""
Finally, you've got your artists who keep their work more cartoonish, like Lili Piri and Kelly Vivanco.
And finally, what is more kitsch inspired than a pathwork deer figurine? Illustrator Melissa Haslam has that also...
So again, whether this is new style on the rise, or just a small movement by young artists, it's an interesting thought, in my opinion.
While some of their art has been considered more "illustrative" or commercial, galleries throughout L.A., Australia, and Tokyo are marketing their work as art.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/728f1/728f1aebd75b7346763a329da8423eaa57d7bd69" alt=""
oversaturated with the work of proteges and copy-cats, but before it entirely does, I don't think the younger art viewers mind it.
But what about other generations?
Is it something a lot of people could like?
Should it be in galleries? Or simply illustrations in magazines?
I'd like to hear what people think!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ec72/7ec72f8fce9632e162a935128df9129396fa1712" alt=""
"Sisters" Kelly Vivanco
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57a2f/57a2fbe1ca7b42778fc76fa6dbec381af035a823" alt=""
"Apparition" Melissa Haslam
Is it something a lot of people clould like?- the sales and proliferation of such items indicates that it is.
ReplyDeleteShould it be in galleries? Yes, why not/ It's not my cup of tea, but it's surely part of a gallery's remit to ask questions about what we value as art , and one way of doing so is to display things which are commonly regarded as kitsch.
Incidentally, it's worth comparing the pieces illustrated here with that of Greuze (there's a lot in London's Wallace collection).
TD